website/content/posts/nixos.md

title	date	desc
My thoughts on NixOS	2024-06-30T20:57:37Z	A few weeks ago I decided to try out NixOS.

For about a year, I have used Arch Linux. However, a few weeks ago, I decided to try out NixOS. Here are some of my thoughts about it.

Configuration

Overall, NixOS is a very unique distribution that feels unlike anything else out there. In particular, the way you configure NixOS is different from what you would do on Arch Linux.

The Nix language

The way you configure NixOS is by writing the configuration in a declarative language called Nix. This configuration is then read by the Nix daemon, which instructs the Nix package manager to install the required packages in the Nix store.

For example, if you wanted to enable OpenGL, you would have to write something along the lines of:

hardware.graphics = {
	enable = true;
	enable32Bit = true;
};

NixOS would install every single thing required to enable OpenGL completely automatically.

I found this approach brilliant because it essentially means that someone out there has prepared the optimal configuration, and now everyone gets to reuse it completely for free.

Take Steam, for example. If you want to play games, you need to write:

programs.steam.enable = true;

This single line not only installs Steam on your system but also provides configurations that make your system more tailored for running games.

Configuring services

Let's say you are running a server and want to enable Nginx. You can do it like this to get the optimal configuration for free, without having to deal with Nginx config files:

services.nginx = {
	enable = true;
	recommendedGzipSettings = true;
	recommendedOptimisation = true;
	recommendedProxySettings = true;
	recommendedTlsSettings = true;
};

This is amazing.

The way NixOS works makes it extremely easy not only to configure the system but also to save the configuration. It's trivial to commit it into a version control system (VCS), ensuring reproducibility and ease of deployment across multiple systems.

Home configuration

However, there are some rough edges.

By default, there isn't really a way to configure the home directory for a single user. The traditional concept of "dotfiles" isn't really covered by vanilla NixOS.

Instead, you have to install a third-party module called home-manager. This allows you to install software for a single user, as well as populate the home directory with various configuration files.

I decided to use this module in my configuration, and generally, it was quite nice to use, but there were some rough edges. For example, when I tried to install KDE Connect via home-manager, it installed the version for Plasma 5 instead of Plasma 6.

services.kdeconnect.enable = true;

I found that it's better to just install this program in the main config instead. Other than this home-manager works pretty good, and it is very useful, so I recommend using it.

Channels

NixOS has different channels you can use for packages. A channel is essentially a current set of packages and/or options that can be used in your configuration. Currently, you can use the 24.05 channel for stable, or unstable for the latest updates (which is actually quite stable).

I'm kind of on the fence about channels.

On one hand, it's nice that the set of packages in 24.05 is nearly set in stone because updating your system is less resource-intensive. On the other hand, the packages aren't updated frequently, which means you're stuck with Neovim 0.9.5 for the next half a year or so -- sad!

So, if you want to have a newer Neovim version, you have to pull it from unstable. Yes, it's possible to do this while keeping your system pinned to the stable channel. But at that point, isn't it better to just pull everything from unstable?

This is what I went with, and it works for me so far, but I'm not sure how it will be in the long run...

Flakes

There is a completely different and experimental (unstable) approach to versioning the system, called flakes, which breaks with the old channel system. I haven't used it myself, so I can't give an opinion about it specifically.

One thing I can say, though, is that I find it pretty confusing how there are several competing systems for writing the system configuration, out of which one is experimental, but lots of people decided to use it anyways.

Final thoughts

NixOS... is interesting. It's different, you do things differently here, even though under all these layers of abstraction, it's still Linux.

It gets some things extremely right.

It lets you pull many versions of the same package because everything is hashed and kept in a flat store on your hard drive.

It lets you easily write the dependencies for your projects because you can just write a shell.nix file specifying them and then use the nix-shell command to pull them all into your shell.

For example, to build this website, I have a shell.nix file like this:

{ pkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {} }:

pkgs.mkShell {
	buildInputs = with pkgs; [
		cargo
		clippy
		esbuild
		nodePackages.pnpm
		pagefind
		python3
		rust-analyzer
		rustc
		rustfmt
	];

	RUST_SRC_PATH = "${pkgs.rust.packages.stable.rustPlatform.rustLibSrc}";
}

I can just do this to build it:

kamov@msi ~/D/website (main)> nix-shell --command fish
kamov@msi ~/D/website (main)> make

Everything is isolated, you can easily roll-back your system to a previous state.

You can experiment.

You can have lots of fun!

But it feels rough around the edges.

If you feel like having an adventure, go right ahead...

Cheers!